Center Valley Animal Rescue followed through on this intent nearly 2 years later (now). MARCH 2021. I ALLEGE Criminal Theft with premeditated intent and massive Civil rights violations. STAY TUNED this STORY WILL GET VERY BIG once I have All my Homework done.

To me, in my opinion, this Thread shows malicious intent on the part of Center Valley Animal Rescue and other parties.  As of March 12, 2021 in an Evidentiary Hearing at the Jefferson County Courthouse in Port Townsend I learned that Center Valley Animal Rescue has approx. $11,000 in Liens against Michaels "property", his dog, Moses, his Family and Emotional Support Animal. As I see it this was done to STEAL the dog. 

Here are a Few of the Comments from the 253 Comments on the Center Valley Animal Rescue Facebook Page. 

For Full Facebook Thread with Malicious Intent to STEAL a man's property, defame and cause intentional harm, click here

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1J-jbU0Nkg90G0P8KmqIqKYVbQQLlzPwH/view

NOTE that Michael's, the Owner, the Victim's side was deleted, just like with the Port Townsend Community Page did.

First Up we see Jasmine Glaze talking to Sara,

the CVAR director and suggesting the placing of a lien.

Animal Attorney Adam Karp joins the Lynch Mob and offers up a Statute.

Let's take a Look at RCW 60.56.025

RCW 60.56.025

Lien created for care of animal seized by law enforcement officer.

If a law enforcement officer authorizes removal of an animal pursuant to chapter 16.52 RCW, the person or entity receiving the animal and aiding in its care or restoration to health shall have a lien upon the animal for the cost of feeding, pasturing, and caring otherwise for the animal. The lien attaches on the date such costs are due and payable but are unpaid. Any such person is authorized to retain possession of the animal until such costs are paid or the lien expires, whichever first occurs.

Source

https://app.leg.wa.gov/RCW/default.aspx?cite=60.56.025

Have a Vet File a Lien, oh ya we just happen to have one of those. 

Hold his "property" aKa THEFT and with proven criminal intent, in my opinion.   

So, is this tampering with evidence in a criminal case? What came first CVAR's agenda or the Criminal Case? 

Was the dog Evidence in that prior Criminal Case? 

Sounds kind of like a premeditated set up to me, and at the unjust enrichment of all parties, especially Center Valley Animal Rescue. 

INTENT TO STEAL A MAN'S PROPERTY?

SURE LOOKS THAT WAY TO ME. 

So Hold the property (dog) until you can set him up for criminal charges?

"WHAT DO WE HAVE TO DO TO STOP THIS?"

"DO WE NEED TO BREAK THE LAW"

LET'S DO IT

Did CVAR follow the stray dog laws? Did the Sheriff?

Why did Moses not go to HSJC, the Humane Society?

Why NOW in the Current Criminal Case, was Moses picked up on November 23, 2020, by NOON on November 24th 2020, CVAR already had possession of Moses per the thread above of Michelle Sanchez's Conversation with the "Pound". 

Was the Stray Hold at HSJC laws or rules broke in the current case. Barely one night and off to 

Center Valley Animal Rescue, knowing who the dog's owner was? I call this THEFT with malicious intent to harm an innocent man.

So Helpful to Research how to Steal a Dog, a man's property and emotionally torment him.  WOW !!!

ANIMAL ATTORNEY ADAM P. KARP

HEY WANNA STEAL THAT GUYS DOG AND DRIVE HIM TO SUICIDE?

 OR JUST WANT

TO STEAL HIS PERSONAL PROPERTY?
   

"I CAN HELP" 


HERE'S A WASHINGTO LAW, DO THIS.  YA AND THEN OVER THE NEXT YEAR THEY SET UP MICHAEL ALLMAIN AND THEN I ALLEGE UNCLIPPED MOSES FROM HIS LEAD, THEN CALLED THE COPS, THEN CONVIENTLY KNEW MOSES HAD BEEN AT LARGE AND PICKED UP BY THE "POUND" BY THE VERY NEXT MORNING.   

WOWEEE !!!

OK SO NOW WAIT WHO DID WHAT?

 So HSJC is not animal control, that is JCSO (last time) (this time it is the City of Port Townsend March 18, 2021 now as I type this from an animal at large as of November 23, 2020.

JCSO MADE THE MISTAKE?

CVAR DID NOT CALL THE SHERIFF FOR PROPER HOLD TIMES?

SAY WHAT ?

WERE THE STRAY ANIMAL LAWS FOLLOWED THIS CURRENT ANIMAL AT LARGE HOLD TIME 4 MONTHS LATER.  

THEY STOLE THIS DOG 4 MONTHS AND COUNTING. 

I WILL ABSOLUTELY ADOPT THIS DOG AND PAY FOR ITS MEDICAL CARE? 

HMMM BUT NOT IF THE HOMELESS GUY KEEPS IT? 

 SOMETHING FISHY THERE TOO. 

GET A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER LIEN FOR VET FEES?

UMMM THEY CLEARLY STOLE THE DOG WITH INTENT.

OK SO THEY PLANNED FOR OVER A YEAR TO PLACE A LIEN ON THIS MAN'S PROPERTY.  THEY SET THIS MAN UP, AND I ALLEGE LET HIS DOG LOSE THEN CALLED THE COPS.  THEN THEY TOOK THEIR STOLEN PROPERTY TO AN UNDISCLOSED LOCATION OF WHICH THE OWNER WAS NOT ALLOWED TO KNOW BUT ALL THE CLATTERING LYNCH MOB HAD ACCESS TO THAT INFORMATION. 

THEN THEY RACK UP $11,600 IN BILLS FOR AN ANIMAL, PROPERTY, THEY STOLE AND THE OWNER CAN'T HAVE THIS PROPERTY UNLESS THEY PAY THE SEEMING BLACK MAIL MONEY?

SO THAN MICHAEL IS GUILTY OF ANIMAL ABUSE UNLESS HE CAN PAY $2500 TO THE CITY, AND $11,600 TO THE UNJUST ENRICHMENT OF CVAR, AND THEN MAGICALLY HE IS NOT AN ABUSER?    SAY WHAT?

THEN THEY PRESS CRIMINAL CHARGES IN 2021 AND USE EVIDENCE FROM 2019 BASED ON HEARSAY AND NO PRIOR CONVICTION. OTHERWISE KNOWN AS, THEY PREJUDICED MICHAEL ALLMAN BY BRINGIN IN IRRELEVANT PAST EVENTS AND HEARSAY WITH NO CONVICTION. 

KEEP CALLING THE PROSECUTORS OFFICE?

IS THAT WHAT HAPPENED? THEY GOT SO MANY CALLS THEY DECIDED TO SACRIFICE MICHAEL ALLMAIN, HIS FAMILY, HIS PROPERTY, HIS BEST FRIEND TO SILENCE ALL THOSE CALLS?

Email the Humane Society to get their Attention at friends@HSJCWA.org they say.  Why do so 

many seem to have rights and resources in all this except NOT the dog's owner? Discrimination perhaps? Yep, going with YES on that. 

More to This Story at 

https://MichaelandMoses.blogspot.com/