Remember the Torus Stone that Broke TSA? Think Tartaria.
https://michaeltellinger.com/torus-stone-comes-home-to-the-museum/
Friday, January 21, 2022
Tartaria - THE BIGGEST OF ELECTRICAL PLANTS
THE BIGGEST OF ELECTRICAL PLANTS
"When the parasites took over the Tartarian complex in Rome to establish 'Vatican City' in 1929, important artifacts began to be removed and a false church leader - known as Pope Pius XI - took control of all the palaces and power plants. ". "The Vatican complex (Batu-Khan) was a sort of 'Tatar' master key. However, the parasites did not disrupt the toroidal vortex circuits - but began to use them in secret. The Vatican complex has one of the largest colonnades of the world in its northern part. Colonnades are mighty coils." Excerpt from my original text, written for my Aether video
Fresco with coat of arms of Pope Pius VII.
AETHER by Marcia Ramalho
Click Below To Watch Video
Thursday, January 20, 2022
COVID Death Risk Has Always Been Low — Vaxxed or Not
STORY AT-A-GLANCE
- In recent days, the pandemic narrative has undergone a remarkable number of U-turns
- January 9, 2022, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky sent out a tweet saying “We must protect people with comorbidities from severe COVID-19,” in other words, focused protection, which is what tens of thousands of doctors have been calling for since the creation of The Great Barrington Declaration in early October 2020
- January 10, 2022, Walensky admitted that the COVID shots cannot prevent transmission
- The CDC is now saying you should not retest once you’ve recovered from COVID, as the PCR can provide false positives for up to 12 weeks after the infection has been resolved. They’re also cutting the isolation requirement from 10 to just five days — probably because the failing economy is hurting Biden’s approval rating so they need people to work
- The narrative is also changing on what makes for a COVID case and how deaths are counted. Walensky recently admitted about 40% of “COVID patients” tested positive but do not have symptoms and are hospitalized for something else. She has also promised to deliver data on how many people have actually died “from” COVID and how many died “with” it
As noted by Dr. Ron Paul in the January 10, 2022, Liberty Report above, U.S. authorities have suddenly started to change their tune with regard to COVID and the COVID shots.
“The opposition to our position are starting to wake up,” Paul says, as some shreds of truth are actually starting to be acknowledged. The good news, Paul says, is that “Maybe some of the things they’ve been saying are not quite accurate, and maybe what we’ve been saying is closer to the truth, and maybe they’re starting to recognize that.”
CDC Director Now Calls for Focused Protection
Indeed, in recent days, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has made a remarkable number of U-turns, completely reversing course on several narrative points.
For example, in a January 10, 2022, CNN interview, CDC director Dr. Rochelle Walensky actually admitted that “what [the COVID shots] can’t do anymore is prevent transmission,”1 whereas before, the narrative was that if you get the jab, you have nothing to worry about anymore. In July 2021, President Biden promised that if you get vaccinated, “you’re not going to get COVID.”2 Well, it wasn’t true. Many knew that, but were censored when pointing it out.
A day earlier, January 9, Walensky also sent out a tweet saying “We must protect people with comorbidities from severe COVID-19,” which is what tens of thousands of doctors have been calling for since the creation of The Great Barrington Declaration in early October 2020. It called for focused protection of high-risk individuals, such as the elderly, rather than blanket lockdowns.
It was recently revealed that Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and his former boss, now retired National Institutes of Health (NIH) director Francis Collins, colluded behind the scenes to quash the declaration.3 For whatever reason, Fauci and Collins were hell-bent on pushing economy-destroying lockdowns instead. In an October 8, 2020, email to Fauci, Collins wrote:4,5,6,7
“The proposal from the three fringe epidemiologists who met with the Secretary seems to be getting a lot of attention … There needs to be a quick and devastating published take down of its premises …”
“Don’t worry, I got this,” Fauci replied. Later, Fauci sent Collins links to newly published articles refuting the focused protection solution, including an op-ed in Wired magazine, and an article in The Nation, titled “Focused Protection, Herd Immunity and Other Deadly Delusions.”
CDC Follows Political Strategy, Not Science
Now, all of a sudden, Walensky is onboard with the “deadly delusion” of focused protection. Her about-face would be confusing were it not for the fact that COVID countermeasures were never about protecting the public from a virus. From the start, the pandemic had political goals, and it still does.
The pressure is now on to prove the Biden administration has made some sort of progress with the pandemic. Biden made a lot of promises, none of which have come to fruition, so now the political establishment is scrounging to come up with some plan that can make them look as though they’re getting somewhere.
The problem is that cases are now exploding, when a successful vaccine campaign should have brought the situation under control. So, they now need a way to minimize the number of cases, whereas before, they used every trick in the book to overcount them,8 in order to scare people into complying with COVID restrictions and getting the jab.
New Testing Guidance Aims to Lower Case Rates
One simple way to cut down cases is to limit testing, and that’s another U-turn we’re now seeing. The CDC is now saying you should not retest once you’ve recovered from COVID. If you test positive, just quarantine for five days and don’t retest to confirm that you’re negative, as the PCR can provide false positives for up to 12 weeks after the infection has been resolved.
Well, we’ve known this for nearly two years already. From the start, experts warned that the PCR cannot be used to diagnose an active infection, as it can pick up RNA from dead, noninfectious viral debris.
Health authorities are now spinning the tale that these revisions in guidance are because we have two years’ worth of data, and they’re just following the science. But that’s pure baloney, seeing how the data never supported their COVID restrictions in the first place.
The CDC’s decision to revise quarantine guidelines down from 10 days to just five days also appears politically motivated. Polls show the economy is a primary concern of voting Americans right now, so they need to strike a balance between the desired demolition of the economy and keeping people at work — at least until the 2022 elections are over.
There seems to be a LOT of sudden momentum surging in the direction of ending the pandemic. If I’m right, we’re going to see even more of this, and pretty quickly, since Biden has to wrap it up in time to declare victory on March 1. ~ Jeff Childers
In short, I suspect most if not all of the recent changes in COVID guidance is to build a narrative that the Biden administration has successfully brought the pandemic under control and reestablished a working economy. The change in narrative is based on political strategy, not science.
CDC Highlights Role of Comorbidities in Vaxxed COVID Deaths
As noted by Paul in the Liberty Report above, Walensky recently stated that 75% of COVID deaths had four or more comorbidities, “So, really, these are people who were unwell to begin with.” The admission went viral and was cited as proof that COVID is a lethal risk for none but the sickest among us.
The CDC quickly stepped in, clarifying that she meant “75% of COVID deaths among those who have received the COVID jab,” not COVID deaths overall.9 You can see the unedited segment above, where that context is made clear. Still, we know that COVID poses very little risk for healthy unvaccinated people as well, and that comorbidities are a primary risk factor regardless of your COVID jab status.
COVID Death Risk Has Always Been Low — Vaxxed or Not
For example, a 2020 study10 found 88% of hospitalized COVID patients in New York City had two or more comorbidities, 6.3% had one underlying health condition and 6.1% had none.
In late August 2020, the CDC published data showing only 6% of the total death count had COVID-19 listed as the sole cause of death. The remaining 94% had had an average of 2.6 comorbidities or preexisting health conditions that contributed to their deaths.11 So, yes, COVID is a lethal risk only for the sickest among us, just as Walensky said, but that’s true whether you’re “vaccinated” or not.
As for the study12 Walensky discussed in that “Good Morning America” segment, it found that of the 1.2 million COVID jabbed subjects, only 0.0033% died of COVID between December 2020 and October 2021. (And of those, 77.8% had four or more comorbidities.) This study, Walensky claims as evidence that the COVID shot works wonders to reduce the risk of death.
But does it really? Recall studies13 showing the noninstitutionalized infection fatality rate is on average just 0.26% to begin with, and people under the age of 40 have only a 0.01% risk of dying from COVID.14
When we’re talking about a fraction of a percentage point risk, we’re talking about a risk that is close to statistical zero. So, does lowering your risk of death from 0.01% to 0.003% really translate into something worthwhile? And, more importantly, is that reduction worth the risks involved with taking the jab?
Clearly, it’s not a risk-free decision. OneAmerica, a national mutual life insurance company, recently warned that all-cause deaths among working age Americans (18 to 64) are up 40% over prepandemic norms,15 and they cannot be attributed to COVID.
So, what’s causing these deaths? What potentially deadly thing did tens of millions of Americans do in 2021 that they’ve never done before? I’ll let you ponder whether Walensky’s claim that the COVID jab is saving lives is an accurate one.
CDC Admits Large Portion of ‘COVID Patients’ Aren’t
In another recent media appearance, Walensky stated that:16
“In some hospitals that we’ve talked to, up to 40% of the patients who are coming in with COVID-19 are coming in not because they’re sick with COVID, but because they’re coming in with something else and have had … COVID or the Omicron variant detected.”
This, again, is something that we’ve been highlighting since the start of the pandemic. Most so-called “COVID patients” simply weren’t, and still aren’t. They’re hospitalized for something else entirely, and just happen to get a positive test result upon admission — which very possibly is a false positive. Either way, voila, they’re a COVID patient, even though they’re hospitalized for a broken leg or a heart attack.
Tuesday, January 18, 2022
Restitution Hearing Tomorrow. Should be a Good Show. The LAW that does not apply to the LAW.
Michael Allmain Case Port Townsend. Yes It Goes On and On and On. The Lawlessness of the Port Townsend Justice System is Very Clear to See.
January 19th, 2022 there will be a Restitution Hearing in the Case, as Michael had been found GUILT last July because Judge Mindy Walker, who ruled him indigent and gave him a public attorney on your TaxPayer Dime, well she ruled Michael Allmain NOT Indigent and therefore Guilty, now he is suddenly indigent again?
So Funny Right? A hearing where Defendant Michael Allmain has to pay restitution to those who set him up, sued him, stole his dog, nearly drove him to suicide and guess what he has an ATTORNEY for FREE yet Again, a Public Defender, yet Judge Mindy Walker RULED Michael Allmain was GUILTY because he was not Indigent, and she had NO PROOF at all of his being Indigent (which the LAW requires her to have to GIVE a Public Defender).
Corruption, Lawless, You Decide. Either way it certainly does make a mockery of the so called Law in Port Townsend Jefferson County.
Will Let you know what Happens. What a Mess Right. The Michael Allmain Case shows you how all the moving parts to Corruption, injustice, selective prosecution work. Here is the Michael Allmain case Chronology in full so far, more will be added.
Monday, January 3, 2022
“My Child Was Approached by a Stranger IN MY HOME” Port Townsend Post Office Employee Allegedly Entered a PRIVATE Home and Approached a Child. Officer David Dostaler “If it is that lady the chance of cooperation is very small”, “you have made false claims in the past”
Port Townsend Police Officer David Dostaler seemingly making "DEMONSTRABLY FALSE CLAIMS". Port Townsend Homeowner SAYS: “My Child Was Approached by a Stranger IN MY HOME” Port Townsend Post Office Employee Allegedly Entered a PRIVATE Home and Approached a Child. Officer David Dostaler Says: “If it is that lady the chance of cooperation is very small”, “you have made false claims in the past”.
Man Walks into a Local Home and wanders around, ALLEGEDLY.
The Man says he was just inside the home, shown on Officer Cam.
The police officer "LIED?" and says the man said he did not come into the home.
Yet the Officer Cam clearly shows the man saying that he did step inside the home, "I did not go any further then just step in the door". TO Me that is INSIDE THE PRIVATE HOME.
A man can walk right into your home, your child and you are scared and the police do nothing? And accuse you of demonstrably false claims in the past and so you must not be telling the truth now.
Port Townsend Police OFFICER David Dostaler QUOTES
“If it is that lady the chance of cooperation is very small”
“She will stay there on principal she's that kind of person”
“you have made false claims in the past”
“That have been demonstrably false”
“Is your son going to say anything other than what you want him to say”
In a town where a homeless man’s dog has an allergy and he is criminally convicted of neglect and abuse and his emotional support dog STOLEN, rampant drug and violence at the fairgrounds last year, homeless man criminally trespassed over and over for sleeping, yet a man walks into a home in Port Townsend, private property, the owner feels threatened and the police can't or won’t do anything?
Some people are IMPORTANT and heard and others, well they are just Criminals.
Here are a few posts I saw online regarding this matter in Port Townsend.
He Said She Said? What? Facts are Facts.
Did the man enter the home or not?
We don't believe teenagers, are we in the 1950's. WOW Right? Commissioner Kate Dean says it is a he said she said. A frightened child, a home invaded, rights violate and a HE SAID SHE SAID? ya I don't think so Kate, not if there were competent investigators that cared about peoples' rights, and had a clue how to actually INVESTIGATE.
Did Officer David Dostaler do ANY investigation?
Did he ask the Post Office Employees if the man said he went into the home? NOPE, he simply berated the woman, talked nasty about her, prejudiced here and did not even bother to INVESTIGATE the matter.
USPS Employee Alleged Trespass
ENTERS Private Home.
“My Child Was Approached by a Stranger IN MY HOME”
A Port Townsend Post Office Employee walks into a private home, child and homeowner afraid, cop is belligerent and clearly discriminating. Homeowner felt they were mistreated, prejudiced, and a target of racism.
Port Townsend Police Officer accuses Citizen of False Claims and Being “on the edge of” Belligerent. And of making her child lie.
Post Office Employee Claims he did not Enter the Home, according to Officer David Dostaler, however, listen the Officer Cam yourself, sure seems to me that the guy admitted to the homeowner he went into the home, and apologized and did so in front of other USPS employees. And the Officer Cam shows the USPS employee stating that he went just inside, and talked of food on the table.
You Decide what you "Believe".
Seems to me if Vehicle is Parked Illegally, and if that is the Truth, then the Law would dictate towing the Vehicle and NOT entering a private home or harassing a private citizen, in my opinion.
Also in my opinion, unwanted guests opening a door and looking in, is trespassing, is threatening. Also note, it seems to be the Port Townsend Police Policy that if you called for help or complained in the past and it did not pan out, then you are prejudiced for future events, that too seems illegal to me, unethical at best. I was not there and am in no way bearing witness. I am simply reporting On What I have Found Out So Far.
Citizen Complaint Filed
Dawn Mohrbacher Citizen Complaint 12-14-2021 Reported to Chief Olson of the Port Townsend Police Department, Officer Jason Greenspane took Complaint over phone, as link below shows.
It is Alleged that a United States Post Office employee Entered a Private Home in Port Townsend, and walked around several rooms, Without Permission. Complainant is worried of Retaliation.
USPS Employee Enters Home, Officer Berates Homeowner, Officer David Dostaler Citizen Complaint 12-14-2021, Click Below to Read
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yvKktNd_4YOCkOfjhJbJnUHbMopvvRjR/view?usp=sharing
Port Townsend Police Incident Report
6:30 a.m 12-14-2021
Post Office Clerk, Alleged Driveway Blocking, SPOKE WITH A TRUCK DRIVER WHO WAS TRYING TO GET HIS TRUCK BACKED TO THE RAMP, BUT VEHICLE ACROSS THE STREET WAS PARKED IN THE WAY.
ALSO SPOKE WITH POST OFFICE EMPLOYEE WHO SAID HE HAD ATTEMPTED TO MAKE CONTACT AT THE HOUSE, AND KNOCKED ON MULTIPLE DOORS AND FOUND ONE PARTIALLY OPEN WITH THE LIGHTS ON, SO HE STUCK HIS HEAD INTO CALL FOR SOMEONE BUT RECEIVED NO ANSWER.
VEHICLE WAS PARKED WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE SLANTED PART OF THE CURB INDICATING THE DRIVEWAY, THEREFORE NOT LEGALLY PARKED. I ATTEMPTED TO CONTACT THE RESIDENT ABOUT MOVING IT.
DAWN ANSWERED AND WAS ON THE EDGE BELLIGERENT FROM THE START.
SHE CLAIMED THAT THE POST OFFICE EMPLOYEE HAD ENTERED HER HOUSE AND GONE DOWN TO THE BASEMENT LOOKING FOR PEOPLE.
SHE ASKED HER TEENAGE CHILD IF THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED IN A MANNER THAT WAS AN IMPLIED COMMAND TO AGREE WITH HER.
ON MULTIPLE PREVIOUS CONTACTS WITH DAWN SHE HAS PROVEN HERSELF WILLING TO SAY WHATEVER SHE NEEDS TO, TO GET WHAT SHE WANTS OR CONTROL THE
SITUATION, PREVIOUSLY MAKING DEMONSTRABLY FALSE CLAIMS.
WE ALSO RECEIVED NO CALLS FROM HER OR HER CHILDREN REPORTING THAT SOMEONE HAD ENTERED THEIR HOUSE.
WHEN I SPOKE WITH THE POST OFFICE EMPLOYEE HE SAID HE DID NOT ENTER THE HOUSE.
12/14/202107:26:01 ddostaler Narrative: DAWN INDICATED THAT SHE WAS GOING TO BE TAKING HER KIDS TO SCHOOL SO SHE WOULD BE MOVING HER VEHICLE SHORTLY ANYWAYS.
SHE RE-APPROACHED ME WHEN SHE CAME OUT TO LEAVE SAYING THAT I ACCUSED HER OF LYING.
WE HAD A FRANK CONVERSATION ABOUT THE HISTORY OF HER CLAIMS IN THE PAST THAT HAVE BEEN UNTRUE.
AXON RECORDED.
12/14/202107:29:22 ddostaler Narrative: I WARNED DAWN FOR PARKING WITHIN 5 FEET OF THE DRIVEWAY.
12/14/202110:07:22 cnorman Narrative:*** STEVEN SPENCER WALK IN AT PTPD
12/14/202110:07:29 cnorman Narrative:*** STEVEN POSTMASTER
12/14/202110:07:39cnorman Narrative: WOULD LIKE TO DISCUSS FURTHW732
12/14/202110:07:47cnormanNarrative: STEVEN OS PTPD FOR CONTACT
12/14/202110:08:35cnorman Narrative:*** STEVEN OK W
12/14/202110:20:39ddostalerNarrative: SPOKE WITH RAP ABOUT THE INCIDENT. GAVE HIM INFORMATION ABOUT HOW TO DO AN OPEN RECORDS REQUEST ACT.
Click Below To Read Police Incident Report
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17HhlIaQ30uDnrIaFX8k8dHdgE8UedIwx/view?usp=sharing
POLICE FOI eMails Regarding this Matter
From: Jason Greenspane
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 20217:43PM
To: David Dostaler Subject: 21-07608
David,
It sounds like the RP in this incident is reporting that a trespass occurred.
Please complete a case report with regards to the allegation and any follow-up you did.
Even If You Do Not Believe It Occurred As Reported, we want to document it and any evidence proving it occurred or did not occur as reported.
I spoke to Dawn tonight and would recommend that you do not recontact her unless called there.
If there's any follow up needed, let me know and somebody else will handle.
I Just Want The Initial Report Done.
Thanks, Jason “
Click Below to Read FOI Email
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1smDbuQiv6YSQ1xnzW721FgopKv9souWK/view?usp=sharing
Sent: Monday, December 20, 2021 11:53PM
Subject: Records Request Re: 21-478
Below is all I have right now.
Currently investigating as a complaint on an officer.
Thanks, Jason
From: Thomas Olson
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 202110:50PM
To: Jason Greenspane
Subject: Re: Citizen Complaint
Was she is nice to you as she was to me and to the city attorney?
ThomasOlson
Chief of Police
Port Townsend Police Department
Dec14, 2021, at 10:48PM,
Jason Greenspane wrote:
Understand. I spoke to her tonight and will be doing that.
From: Thomas Olson
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 202110:42PM
To: Jason Greenspane Subject:
Re: Citizen Complaint
I Already Talked To Dawn. Although it wasn't a pleasant conversation, she said enough to make it a formal citizen complaint.
As long as he didn’t flat out call her a liar, it sounds like minor courtesy complaint that can be handled with documented counseling.
I am guessing that Dave’s bodycam footage should answer most of your questions.
Thanks,
Thomas Olson
Jason Greenspane wrote:
Got it. I have Call in to Dawn Mohrbacher to see if she would like to file a complaint. I left her voicemail. I Have Already spoken to David about the matter and counseled him on the more appropriate way to handle a situation like this.
I am not sure if it will turn into an official complaint or not at this point but will complete complaint documentation if it does for sure.
Thanks, Jason
From: Thomas Olson
Sent: Tuesday, December 14, 20213:01PM
To: Jason Greenspane
Cc: Garin Williams
Subject: Citizen Complaint
Jason, Please Look Into Citizen's Complaint form this morning on Dave Dostaler. Theincident started out as a parking complaint on Harrison Street next to the rear of the post office.
The call was at 0634 and the incident number is 21-7608.
I talked to the complainant, Dawn Mohrbacher and told her we would look into her complaint of our officer calling her a liar in front of her teenage son. Dave self-reported to me, stating that he “called her a liar without actually calling her a liar.”
He also said that he has had a number of contacts with her and she has been untruthful to him in the past.
During this incident, Mohrbacher claimed that an employee from the post office entered her home without permission, but she didn't call 911 to report a burglary.
Dave felt she was untruthful about what actually happened.
Please investigate, address the behavior as you see fit, and contact Mohrbacher and advise her of the outcome. Please provide me with all the details so we can track it as a citizen complaint.
Thanks, Thomas Olson |Chief of Police
Click Below to Read FOI email
https://drive.google.com/file/d/17B2bxlpNSYTRJX_pSf_b3OdVp9Rmgkcu/view?usp=sharing
Port Townsend Police OFFICER QUOTES
“If it is that lady the chance of cooperation is very small”
“She will stay there on principal she's that kind of person”
“you have made false claims in the past”
“That have been demonstrably false”
“Is your son going to say anything other than what you want him to say”
I would say it is “flat out” calling someone a liar to say what Officer David Dostaler Said Above in quotes.
It is a police officer saying because he believes this woman has lied in the past that she is lying now, except he calls it “false claims” instead of “lie”. Same Thing I Allege. Click Below to Watch Officer Cam from December 14th 2021 Incident.
Dawn Mohrbacher Port Townsend Homeowner Says:
“I don’t Call You, Because I Don’t Trust You”
“My Child Was Approached by a Stranger IN MY HOME”
"This is Why I don’t Call You,
You Don’t Do Anything”
Part One Officer David Dostaler Cam
https://rumble.com/vrvl4q-port-townsend-usps-employee-alleged-trespass.-officer-david-dostaler.html
Part Two Officer David Dostaler Cam https://rumble.com/vrvvsj-part-two-port-townsend-usps-employee-alleged-trespass.-officer-david-dostal.html
Posted Here by Reverend Crystal Cox
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)